Since Anna died from ghosts trying to take over her body too hastily I don't think she's become one of them at least there seems to be nothing to indicate that. I remember one of the diaries I think mentioning that it was the nuclear detonation that anchored the crew. The ghosts say that you can't change the past.but then what about Michael? When do they accuse Alex? They do resent her for being a part of humanity in general, I mean humanity which wiped them from memory, but they're appreciative of her dabbling with their signal because it gives them a shot at leaving the other side.Īnna is still gone. Originally posted by Gremlin:The ghosts aren't in control of the time loops, and accuse Alex of being the the one to cause them. Then again, I was unwilling to believe there was no other ending to Mass Effect 3 and we all know how that turned out ) Anyway, anyone got any thoughts on this?
So, what exactly is the "vanilla" way of recreating the past? I made one mistake in my last playthrough, because in a flashback I told Michael to stay with Clarissa when in fact when angry at Alex she states "Michael was going to leave" rather than "we were going to leave". Hence I'm thinking there must be a way of configuring them to cook up something different. I mean, the dead submarine crew say they've witnessed the world's demise countless times and that all they have is their anger (as in, they're unwilling to accept that their death and the fact they've been forgetten by society).Īlso, of the three key decisions only telling Michael no to leave has direct influence on the outcome whether to break up with Clarissa and whether Jonas should see his mom have no effect. The general premise of the story is that you can't change the past and that fate governs happenings. I'm kinda unwilling to believe there's no other ending than the loopey-loop one.